Madonna con
Bambino Benedicente or, Madonna del Pollice by Giovanni Bellini in 1460-1464 |
This is my favourite picture in the world. Available to view at the Accademia Gallery in Venice. Top quality workmanship with delightful Infant Jesus and engaging air of pensive melancholy shown by Mary. Highly conducive to holy contemplation.
And here is one by D Hockney called Mr and Mrs Clark and their cat Percy (painted in 1970-1971; now at Tate Britain Gallery). The cat wasn't even called Percy - its name was Blanche though speaking as one whose cat is called Blackie I can't really complain about a white cat called Blanche. However, the name Percy is the best thing about this painting in my opinion. I nearly called our son Percy but decided he might never forgive me so there was a fontside rethink. Now he is 15 and he regularly berates me for not calling him Percy as he would have liked it. He is lucky not to be still called G-AHLK actually so he should count his blessings.
Here is what I object to about this painting:
1) General style. It is like one of the illustrations they used to have in Ladybird books - perfectly adequate in its way, but hardly great art. In fact the colours are rather less subtle than one would hope to find in a Ladybird book. The treatment is crude and undetailed.
See what I mean? Far better. |
2) Composition. Vastly improved if a live figure stands in front of the painting.
I can not understand why the telephone or the yellow book have been included. They are not things of beauty and their significance escapes me.
I can not understand why the telephone or the yellow book have been included. They are not things of beauty and their significance escapes me.
3) Figures: Has Mr Clark a club foot? It appears so. (His left foot). [One presumes his right foot looks peculiar because half of it is buried in the decadent thick carpet. It could be a homage to the fact that Bellini's Jesus' right foot seems only to have 4 toes, but I doubt it.] Also he might have had the good manners to sit up straight for the portrait. It is unconventional anyway for a gentleman to be sitting down if there are ladies present who have not got a seat and this is a possible explanation for the peevish mood in which Mrs Clark is here depicted. Alternatively she may be looking cross because even though Mr Clark is a fashion designer (I looked it up) they have put her in an old sack for the occasion.
4) Other annoying things: Why is the telephone on the floor? What is that weird thing beside it? Why aren't either of these plugged in? The shadow under the chair does not look right. That picture hanging on the wall on the left is (I looked this up too) an etching by D Hockney so one can only admire the nerve of the artist in displaying such self-aggrandisement. The lilies are OK but I must point out that in real life people do not advisedly use narrow vases with high centres of gravity on low tables. That will certainly be knocked over when the cat gets off the bloke's knee.
Verdict: I'll have the Bellini. Julia can have the Percy one.